The theory for sequences in is very similar to that of sequences in . In , we said that a sequence converges to some number if for all , it holds for all suffieciently large. The definition of convergence in is essentially the same, with the absolute value replaced by the complex modulus.
Definition 1: Sequence of Complex numbers
A sequence
in
is a function
For
, we denote the
-th element of the sequence
by
and write the sequence as
In the following we define convergent sequences in .
Definition 2: Convergent sequence in
We say that a sequence
in
converges to
, or equivalently has limit
, denoted by
if it holds:
If there exists such that , we say that the sequence is convergent.
Important
In Definition
2 we still take
to be real. This makes sense, since
for all
.
Example 3
Question. Using Definition
2, prove that
Solution.
Part 1. Rough Work. Let . We need to clarify for which values of the following holds: We have Therefore
Part 2. Formal Proof. We want to prove that for all there exists such that Let . Choose such that The above is equivalent to For we have
Boundedness plays an important role for complex sequences.
Definition 4: Bounded sequence in
A sequence
in
is called
bounded if there exists a constant
, with
, such that
As it happens in , we have that complex sequences which converge are also bounded.
Theorem 5
If a sequence
in
converges, then the sequence is bounded.
The proof is identical to the one in , and is hence omitted. Similarly to real sequences, we can define divergent complex sequences.
Definition 6: Divergent sequences in
We say that a sequence
in
is
divergent if it is not convergent.
As a corollary of Theorem 5 we have the following.
Corollary 7
Let
be a complex sequence. If
is not bounded, then it is divergent.
Algebra of limits in
Most of the results about limits that we have shown in also hold in . The first result is the Algebra of Limits.
Theorem 8: Algebra of limits in
Let and be sequences in . Suppose that for some . Then,
Limit of sum is the sum of limits:
Limit of product is the product of limits:
If for all and , then
The proof of Theorem 8 follows word by word the proof of the Algebra of Limits for sequences in : one just needs to replace the absolute value by the complex modulus.
We can use the Algebra of Limits to compute limits of complex sequences.
Example 9
Question. Compute the limit of
Solution. Factor , the largest power of in the denominator, where we used the Algebra of Limits. Finally,
Convergence to zero
One of the results that cannot hold for complex sequences is the Squeeze Theorem. Indeed the chain of inequalities would not make sense in , since there is no order relation.
We can however prove the following (weaker) result.
Theorem 10
Let
be a sequence in
and suppose that
Then
Proof
Assume that
. We need to show that
Let
. Since
, there exists
such that
Let
. Then,
Note that the sequence is real. Therefore the convergence of can be studied using convergence results in .
Example 11
Question. Prove that
, where
Solution. We have Since by the Geometric Sequence Test for real sequences, we conclude that Hence by Theorem 10.
Although the Squeeze Theorem cannot be used for complex sequences, sometimes it can be used to deal with real terms in a complex sequence.
Example 12
Question. Consider the sequence
Prove that
Solution. We divide by the largest power in the denominator, to get Notice that and thus Since by the Squeeze Theorem we conclude that also In particular we have shown that Using Theorem 10 we infer Similarly, Since by the Squeeze Theorem we conclude Finally, we have and therefore by Theorem 10. Using the Algebra of Limits in we conclude
Geometric sequence Test and Ratio Test in
The Geometric Sequence Test and Ratio Test can be generalized to complex sequences.
Theorem 13: Geometric sequence Test in
Let and let be the geometric sequence in defined by We have:
If , then
If , then sequence is unbounded, and hence divergent.
The proof can be obtained as in the real case, replacing the absolute value by the modulus.
Example 14
Question. Prove that
, where
Solution. We first rewrite Then, we compute By the Geometric Sequence Test .
Example 15
Question. Prove that
diverges, where
Solution. We first rewrite We compute By the Geometric Sequence Test, the sequence diverges.
Example 16
Question. Prove that
diverges, where
Solution. We have and hence the Geometric Sequence Test cannot be applied. However, we can see that that is, assumes only the values , and each of them is assumed infinitely many times. Therefore is oscillating, and thus divergent.
We now provide the statement of the Ratio Test in .
Theorem 17: Ratio Test in
Let be a sequence in such that
Suppose that the following limit exists: Then,
Suppose that there exists and such that Then the sequence is unbounded, and hence does not converge.
The proof of Theorem 17 follows word by word the proof of the Ratio Test Theorem in , and only two minor modifications are needed:
- Replace the absolute value with the complex modulus,
- Instead of the Squeeze Theorem, use Theorem 10.
Example 18
Question. Study the convergence / divergence of the sequence
Solution. We compute Since , by the Ratio Test in we infer .
Convergence of real and imaginary part
A complex number can be written as for some , where
- is the real part of ,
- the imaginary part of .
We can prove that a complex sequence converges if and only if both the real parts and the imaginary parts converge.
Theorem 19
Let
be a sequence in
. For
, let
such that
Let
, with
. Then
Proof
Part 1. Suppose that
To prove that
we need to show that
Let . Since , there exists such that Let . Then The proof for is similar.
Part 2. Suppose that To prove that we need to show that Let . Since , there exists such that Since , there exists such that Let Let . By the triangle inequality,
Example 20
Question. Consider the complex sequence
Show that
Solution. We find the real and imaginary parts of Using the Algebra of Limits for real sequences we have that By Theorem 19 we conclude